Monday, October 6, 2008

THE SPIRITUAL SIDES OF GARDENING: LUTHER BURBANK,
GIANT OF GARDENING & "SAINT"

THE SPIRITUAL SIDES OF GARDENING : LUTHER BURBANK,
A GIANT OF GARDENING WHO WAS HAILED AS
AN "AMERICAN SAINT"

Luther Burbank (March 7, 1849 – April 11, 1926) was an American gardener, botanist, horticulturist and a pioneer in agricultural science.

He developed more than 800 strains and varieties of plants over his 55-year career. Burbank's varied creations included fruits, flowers, grains, grasses, and vegetables. For example, he developed a spineless cactus (useful for cattle-feed) and the plumcot.

Burbank's most successful strains and varieties include the Shasta daisy, the Fire poppy, the July Elberta peach, the Santa Rosa plum, the Flaming Gold nectarine, the Wickson plum, the Freestone peach, and the Burbank potato. Burbank also bred the white blackberry. A natural sport (genetic variant) of the Burbank potato with russet (reddish-brown) skin later became known as the Russet Burbank potato: this large, brown-skinned, white-fleshed potato has become the world's predominant processing potato.

Life and work : Born in Lancaster, Massachusetts, Burbank grew up on a farm and received only an elementary education. The thirteenth of 15 children, he enjoyed the plants in his mother's large garden. His father died when he was 21 years old, and Burbank used his small inheritance to buy a 17 acre (6.8 hectares) plot of land near Lunenburg.

Burbank developed the Burbank potato, 1872 to 1874. Burbank sold the rights to the Burbank potato for $150 and used the money to travel to Santa Rosa, California in 1875. Later, a natural sport of Burbank potato with russetted skin was selected and named Russet Burbank potato. Today, the Russet Burbank potato is the most widely cultivated potato in the United States, prized for processing. McDonald's french fries are made exclusively from this cultivar.

In Santa Rosa, Burbank purchased a 4-acre (1.6 hectares) plot of land, and established a greenhouse, nursery, and experimental fields that he used to conduct crossbreeding experiments on plants, inspired by Charles Darwin's The Variation of Animals and Plants under Domestication. (This site is now open to the public as a city park, Luther Burbank Home and Gardens.) Later he purchased an 18 acre plot of land in the nearby town of Sebastopol for more experimental growing called Gold Ridge Farm.

Burbank's creations included:
The "Shasta Daisy" and a total of 91 types of ornamentals.
The (Russet) Burbank potato.
113 plums and prunes
35 fruiting cacti, including the spineless cactus, a great animal feed.
26 types of vegetables.
16 blackberries (including a white blackberry).
13 raspberries.
11 quinces.
11 plumcots.
10 cherries.
10 strawberries.
10 apples.
9 types of grains, grasses, forage.
8 peaches.
6 chestnuts.
5 nectarines.
4 grapes.
4 pears.
3 walnuts.
2 figs.
1 almond.

Burbank was often criticized by scientists of his day because he did not keep the kind of careful records that are the norm in scientific research and because he was mainly interested in getting results rather than in basic research. Jules Janick, Ph.D., Professor of Horticulture and Landscape Architecture, Purdue University, writing in the World Book Encyclopedia, 2004 edition, went as far as saying: "Burbank cannot be considered a scientist in the academic sense." However, one can wonder who is more useful to society: The scientist in his ivory tower, or the man who selects and develop over 700 varieties of new food plants?

In 1893 Burbank published a descriptive catalog of some of his best varieties, entitled called New Creations in Fruits and Flowers.

In 1907, Burbank published an "essay on childrearing", called "The Training of the Human Plant". In it, he advocated improved treatment of children and eugenic practices such as keeping the unfit and first cousins from marrying. He himself married twice, to Helen Coleman in 1890, which ended in divorce in 1896; and to Elizabeth Waters in 1916. But he had no children. In mid-March 1926, Burbank suffered a heart attack and became ill with gastrointestinal complications. He died on April 11, 1926, aged 77, and is buried near the greenhouse at the Luther Burbank Home and Gardens.

During his career, Burbank wrote, or co-wrote, several books on his methods and results, including his eight-volume How Plants Are Trained to Work for Man (1921), Harvest of the Years (with Wilbur Hall, 1927), Partner of Nature (1939), and the 12-volume Luther Burbank: His Methods and Discoveries and Their Practical Application. New Creations in Fruits and Flowers cover.

Legacy: Burbank's work spurred the passing of the 1930 Plant Patent Act four years after his death. The legislation made it possible to patent new varieties of plants (excluding tuber-propagated plants). In supporting the legislation, Thomas Edison testified before Congress in support of the legislation and said that "This [bill] will, I feel sure, give us many Burbanks." Unfortunately, Hell is often paved with good intentions, and this legislation also gave rise to Monsanto, GMOs and "terminator seeds". Something so revulsive to the unperverted human mind that the mere idea of it would have been enough to make Burbank sick.

At any rate, the Patent Office issued Plant Patents #12, #13, #14, #15, #16, #18, #41, #65, #66, #235, #266, #267, #269, #290, #291, and #1041 to Burbank posthumously. And in 1986, Burbank was inducted into the "National Inventors Hall of Fame". Invent Now Hall of Fame Search Inventor Profile

The Luther Burbank Home and Gardens, in downtown Santa Rosa, are now designated as a National Historic Landmark. Luther Burbank's Gold Ridge Experiment Farm is listed in the National Register of Historic Places a few miles west of Santa Rosa in the town of Sebastopol, California. Gold Ridge Luther Burbank's Experiment Farm


By all accounts, Burbank was a kindly man whose first and foremost goal in life was to help the many. He saw gardens and gardening as the conduit through which people could attain and maintain optimal health. He was very interested in education and often gave both time and money to the local schools.

In fact and as unbelievable as this might seem at first, Paramahansa Yogananda, who introduced "yoga" to the West and is widely recognized as one of the greatest Indian saints of recent history, knew both Burbank and Gandhi well. Yet, it is not to the Mahatma, but to Luther Burbank that he dedicated his great bestseller "Autobiography of a Yogi", hailing him as "An American Saint". Think of it!

Burbank's mystical and spiritual side was completely immersed in Nature and expressed itself through one endeavor: Understanding Nature and working with her through gardens and gardening, so to bring increasingly better plants to fellow human beings, and share with them the tools to emulate his work. If Burbank was a saint, and we have that from quite reliable authority, he was a Gardener saint, and a model for us all to emulate.

His friend and admirer Yogananda wrote in his Autobiography of a Yogi:
"His heart was fathomlessly deep, long acquainted with humility, patience, sacrifice. His little home amid the roses was austerely simple; he knew the worthlessness of luxury, the joy of few possessions. The modesty with which he wore his scientific fame repeatedly reminded me of the trees that bend low with the burden of ripening fruits; it is the barren tree that lifts its head high in an empty boast." (Yogananda, 1946, p. 352)

In a speech given to the First Congregational Church of San Francisco in 1926 a short time before his death, and which can be considered his testament, Burbank said:

"I love humanity, which has been a constant delight to me during all my seventy-seven years of life; and I love flowers, trees, animals, and all the works of Nature as they pass before us in time and space. What a joy life is when you have made a close working partnership with Nature, helping her to produce for the benefit of mankind new forms, colors, and perfumes in flowers which were never known before; fruits in form, size, and flavor never before seen on this globe; and grains of enormously increased productiveness, whose fat kernels are filled with more and better nourishment, a veritable storehouse of perfect food -- new food for all the world's untold millions for all time to come."

Luther Burbank understood we are what we eat, and that the ultimate conduit to maintain or gain back our health is optimal foods from our own gardens. This is the cause he dedicated his entire life to, and his gentle and selfless dedication as well as the way he pursued it was why he was recognized and hailed as "an American Saint" by one of the greatest spiritual authorities of our time.

His life was an unequaled example for us all to study and follow.

BOOKS TO READ:

  • Harvest of the Years, Luther Burbank, with Wilbur Hall - This is Luther Burbank's autobiography published posthumously after his death in 1926.

  • Kraft, K. Luther Burbank, the Wizard and the Man. New York : Meredith Press, 1967 ASIN: B0006BQE6C

  • Yogananda, Paramahansa. Autobiography of a Yogi. Los Angeles : Self-Realization Fellowship, 1946 ISBN 0-87612-083-4

  • Peter Dreyer: A Gardener Touched With Genius The Life of Luther Burbank, # L. Burbank Home & Gardens; New & expanded edition (January 1993), ISBN 0-9637883-0-2

  • Burbank, Luther. “The Training of the Human Plant.” Century Magazine, May 1907. http://hearth.library.cornell.edu/cgi/t/text/pageviewer-idx?sid=ee2702066663ae4e729bbb6c9e6f63d9&idno=4765397 ]

  • Pandora, Katherine. "Luther Burbank". American National Biography. Retrieved on 2006-11-16.

  • Burbank, Luther. The Canna and the Calla: and some interesting work with striking results. Paperback ISBN 978-1414702001

  • Burt, Olive W. Luther Burbank, Boy Wizard. Biography published by Bobbs-Merrill in 1948 aimed at intermediate level students.

  • FIND MORE ABOUT LUTHER BURBANK :

  • Luther Burbank Home and Gardens official website

  • National Inventors Hall of Fame profile

  • Wells Fargo Center for the Arts (formerly the Luther Burbank Center for the Arts)

  • UN report on spineless cactus cultivation in Tunisia

  • Luther Burbank Virtual Museum

  • Autobiography of a Yogi, by Paramhansa Yogananda, Chapter 38: Luther Burbank -- A Saint Amidst the Roses at www.ananda.org

  • The Wisdom of Life

  • A Rare Crossing: Frida Kahlo and Luther Burbank

  • Luther Burbank: His Methods and Discoveries and Their Practical Application, a 12-volume monographic series, is available online through the University of Wisconsin Digital Collections Center.

  • Official website of the Western Sonoma County Historical Society and Luther Burbank's Gold Ridge Experiment Farm




  • [Spir01 - V100-081006] Permalink: http://optimalgardens.blogspot.com/2008/10/spiritual-sides-of-gardening-luther.html

    Copyright 1964-2008 OSL All rights reserved, worldwide. LICENSE IS HEREBY GRANTED to all to freely link to or to reproduce this page by any means of one's choice, virtual or physical, and to republish it, including in a compilation, etc, as long as the entirety of the page is NOT MODIFIED in any manner (except of course your location if you are publishing a community ad of your own). This includes not modifying the present copyright notice and license, and the permanent link (permalink URL) or “web address” of the page, and license is granted as long as reproduction is not part of a commercial venture, that is, as long as you do not charge for it in any way, be it directly, or indirectly, for example in commercial publications. Commercial licenses available from the copyright holder.

    =================================
    WEB DESIGNERS -GRAPHICS ARTISTS -CODERS -SEO & MARKETING -Etc
    If you wish to volunteer to help us set up specialized websites and particularly complex portal sites using the present material and more, presented in a more graphic way, and complemented with multimedia material, we need you! Software such as like of Drupal or Joomla, more advanced forms of Wordpress, etc, is the way to go, so please contact us, you will be very welcome! We already have the hosting, and quite a few domains, all we need is your elbow grease! ;)
    =================================

    PROOF IT IS POSSIBLE TO GET "CITY HALL" TO ACTUALLY DO SOMETHING USEFUL

    PROOF IT IS POSSIBLE TO GET "CITY HALL" TO ACTUALLY DO SOMETHING USEFUL


    Yes, at first thought, most people in most communities will agree it seems almost impossible to get "City Hall" to actually do something constructive and useful, particularly when it comes to issues as fundamental as Health Thru Gardening. Yet, here is a proof that this is not an absolute truth graven in tablets of stone for all eternity.

    The City of Santa Monica is currently considering creating a "Garden Registry". Sure, it hasn't happened yet, but Santa Monica is actually currently exploring the possibility of developing a program to do exactly what we are working on here: Allow private home owners to partner with interested gardeners to use a portion of their property to grow vegetables. Contact rich.rollins@smgov.net if you live in the area. And if you live in LA or surrounding communities, you can contact gabriela@cscommunites.org .

    More, the same city of Santa Monica actually has a "Rain Harvest Rebate Program":

    The City of Santa Monica is now offering rebates on rainwater harvesting equipment and supplies. "Harvesting rainwater from your rooftop protects the Santa Monica Bay, safeguards drinking water supplies, and adds a little excitement into to your life and landscape - and can put money in your pocket".

    Eligibility: Any property owner (resident, institution or business) in the City of Santa Monica and any tenant of said property with the permission of the owner.
    ● Downspouts: Only downspouts that drain DIRECTLY to the alley or street are available for this program. Downspouts that drain to the landscape are NOT available for the redirect rebate program. (So you will have to install a downspout emptying into the alley or street before installing your two barrels and get your $200, but not bad anyway!)
    ● Rain Barrels: Up to 2 barrels per downspout. (If you multiply your downspouts, you can get $200 per spout, but your two barrels must be under 125 gallons each. If over that, you are out of luck! Cheapest is to use surplus 55 gallons drums anyway.)
    ● Cisterns: Up to 2 cisterns per property. (However, if they are under 500 gallons, they are not a "cistern", and you are out of luck -- in other word, forget about installing anything between 125 and 500 gallons, since that would be neither a "barrel" nor a "cistern", and would bring you nothing. Ah, the unsung beauties of the administrative mind!)
    Three "rebates" are available: ("rebates" on what is unclear... property "taxes"? What if you don't pay any?)

    1. Rain Gutter Downspout Redirect Rebate (rainwater percolation): Up to $40 per qualified rain gutter downspout (up to and including all downspouts on one’s property), includes labor and materials. Rebates are available for the cost of redirecting rain gutter downspouts to permeable surfaces, such as landscaped areas.

    2. Rain Barrel Rebate (rainwater storage): Rebates up to $100 per barrel (limited to 125 gallon maximum capacity), includes design, labor and materials.
    3. Cistern Rebate (rainwater storage): Up to $500 per cistern (limited to cisterns over 500 gallons each), includes design, labor and materials.
    Proof of what we are saying can be found here:


    What to do: Multiply the street or alley-oriented "downspouts" and then install two 55 gallons drums per downspout. Redirect the overflow of these drums to two "cisterns". One of 500 gallons, and one of as many gallons as you wish, as long as over 500. You might manage to get between $1,400 and, say, $1,800 or so from the city, and that is to collect enough water to feed you for quite a while, assuming you have an "Optimal Garden", that will use the water sparingly and intelligently.

    A little suggestion to orgsanizing bureaucrats: How about a dollar per gallon of installed capacity, regardless of size? With perhaps a limit on maximum capacity, just in case some residents would come up with 50,000 or 100,000 gallons cisterns? (Human ingenuity is great, and even if one can't imagine where the enterprising resident would put such wonder cisterns, we will agree that prudent administrators should always play safe... ;) On the other hand, isn't the idea to precisely store as much rainwater as possible? And even better, how about cutting the subsidy by half if the water is not used in a food-producing organic garden (Santa Monica does not need any additional chemical pollution), and DOUBLE it if it is?
    So, perhaps not a perfect program, but definitely a step in the right direction, and a practical proof that when citizens awareness rises, as it sure did in Santa Monica in the past few years,"City Hall" somehow has to respond.



    Copyright 2008 OSL. Usual grant of license to reproduce data in unadulterated form non commercially. Permalink for this post: http://optimalgardens.blogspot.com/2008/10/proof-it-is-possible-to-get-city-hall.html

    Friday, October 3, 2008

    "BEYOND ORGANIC" -- AN ISSUE WHOSE TIME HAS COME

    "BEYOND ORGANIC" -- AN ISSUE WHOSE TIME HAS COME

    To introduce the concept and the issues at hand, we will reproduce here an article that first appeared in "Mother Earth News". which we will use a base for further discussion of the necessity to look "Beyond Organic".

    Now, this is a farmer who also raises animals for meat talking. Some people will have some issues with that, for moral reasons, or simply because it is quite clear nowadays that hard data from very, very hard science clearly demonstrates that meat is not that good for us (See "The China Study").

    However that does not make what he says about farms, farming and what we eat and how any less true...


    Everything He Wants to Do is Illegal
    By Megan Phelps

    Joel Salatin is a farmer at the forefront of the trend toward local food and grass-fed meat. Many people first became familiar with Salatin’s complex and eco-minded approach to farming when he was featured in Michael Pollan’s bestselling book, The Omnivore’s Dilemma. But Salatin also is well known within pasture-based farming and libertarian circles. He’s especially vocal about government regulations that make life difficult for the small farmer — his most recent book is titled Everything I Want to Do is Illegal. He’s also the author of You Can Farm and Holy Cows and Hog Heaven (excerpted here in Mother Earth News). Salatin kindly agreed to answer some questions for us about Polyface Farms. Hold onto your hat! Here are Salatin’s candid thoughts on government regulations, high grain prices, vegetarians and making money at farming.

    Grass Fed and Beyond Organic

    Tell us a little bit about Polyface Farm.
    We’re located eight miles southwest of Staunton, Va., in the Shenandoah Valley on 550 acres (100 open and 450 forest). We also lease four farms, totaling an additional 900 acres of pasture. We sell “salad bar” (grass-fed) beef; “pigaerator” pork; pastured poultry, both broilers and turkeys; pastured eggs and forage-based rabbits.

    Your livestock and poultry are grass-fed, and your farm is “beyond organic.” Do you find people are familiar with those terms?
    More and more people are aware of the compromise and adulteration within the government-sanctioned organic certified community. Weary of 6,000-hen confinement laying houses with 3 feet dirt strip being labeled “certified organic,” patrons latch onto the “beyond organic” idea. It resonates with their disappointment over the government program. When Horizon battles Cornucopia, for instance, to keep its organic-certified industrial-scale dairies, consumer confidence falls.

    Intuitively, people understand that the historical use of the word “organic” identified an idea and a paradigm rather than a visceral list of dos and don’ts. And now that the high prices have attracted unscrupulous growers who enter the movement for the money, people realize that no system can regulate integrity. That is why we have a 24 hour a day, 7 day a week, 365 day a year open-door policy. Anyone is welcome to visit at anytime to see anything, anywhere. Integrity can only be assured with this level of transparency.

    When someone asks if we’re certified organic, we respond playfully: “Why would we want to stop there? We go beyond organic.” That response generally leads to an info-dense discussion and people come away with renewed awareness, rather than just another case of hardening of the categories.

    How has the public’s attitude toward your products changed in the last few years? Do you find it easier to sell grass-fed meat now?
    Public awareness is definitely up. In the 1970s when I was selling grass-finished beef and pastured poultry, nobody had even heard of the word “organic,” much less “grass finished.” Now, thanks to New York Times bestselling authors like Jo Robinson and Michael Pollan, the awareness is huge.

    The market limitations are primarily twofold. One is the supply. The artistry and choreography required to move animals around on palatable pasture year-round in any given bio-region takes years to learn. This is not cookie-cutter rations formulated from annuals stored in a big grain bin. The producer deals with on-farm variables such as seasonality, wet, dry, hot, cold, genetic physiology, minerals and a host of others. Beyond that, the Food Safety and Inspection Service has successfully annihilated most community-based, appropriately sized abattoirs (slaughterhouses) and criminalized on-farm processing. This is by far the major impediment to the local integrity of food.

    That’s all on the production/processing end. The second market limitation has to do with entry-level requirements for major marketing channels. From liability insurance to net-90-day payment to slotting fees, large buyers share a Wall-Street business mentality. That mentality aggressively shuns competition, especially from little innovators. But every time industrial food hiccups with recalls and more diseases, another wave of opt-outers hits the local, integrity food scene. Exciting times.

    On Being a Farmer

    When did you decide you wanted to be a farmer?
    As early as I can remember, I’ve wanted to be a farmer. I love growing things. I appreciate the emotional steadiness of animals. Every day when I go to move the cow herd, they are glad to see me. The pigs always come over to talk. None of these critters ever asks you to fill out licenses or threatens litigation. They never talk behind your back or conspire to overthrow you. And to watch the land heal, with ever-growing mounds of earthworm castings, is better than any video. Indeed, walking through a dew-speckled pasture in the early morning after a blessed nighttime thunderstorm, the ground literally covered with copulating earthworms — what could be more magical than that?

    I had my own laying hen flock at 10 years old, pedaling eggs on my bicycle to neighbors, selling them to families in church. The fast-paced, frenzied urban life disconnected from the ponds, the trees and the pasture never held much allure for me. Go away? Why? Where? I think I was planted here. I think God tends my soul here. It’s not for everyone, but it satiates my soul with wonder and gratitude.

    What’s changed about your philosophy of farming over the years?
    Like all geezers, I’ve learned a lot just through experience. Because I’m a third generation-Christian-libertarian-environmentalist-capitalist lunatic I don’t have a conversion epiphany to share. I’ve just always been weird.

    Initially, I thought I would need to work off-farm to stay here, and I learned that wasn’t true. I encourage young people to follow their passion and go ahead and jump. If you wait until all the stars line up, you’ll never do it. In recent years, I’d say my biggest change has been regarding economies of scale and marketing realities. Twenty years ago my vision for the food system in Virginia was thousands of little mom and pop farms like ours serving their neighbors. I no longer think that is viable for two reasons. First, urban centers would be hard pressed to grow all their own food within their communities. Second, most farmers are marketing Neanderthals. Either they really don’t want to be around people, or they don’t know how to interact with them. A successful marketer needs to be a bit theatrical; a storyteller, schmoozer, gregarious type. And that’s not typical, especially among John Deere jockeys.

    What’s the answer? I don’t know, but what I’ve come up with is what I call food clusters. These require production, processing, marketing, accounting, distribution and customers — these six components make a whole. The cluster can be farmer-driven, customer-driven, even distribution-driven initially. But once these six components are in place, it can micro-duplicate the industrial on a bio-regional or foodshed scale, which includes urban centers. I think a local integrity food system could supplant the opaque industrial one in Virginia, but realistically it would comprise several hundred or a thousand $5-$10 million food clusters rather than several thousand mom and pop $100,000 fully-integrated enterprises. I certainly never thought our farm would top $1 million in annual sales, but it happened. We still have no business plan or marketing targets. But we’ve been blessed with a family of enough variety to put together these six foundations for a whole, and that has made all the difference. And I’m a schmoozer.

    What are some of the biggest challenges you’ve faced as a farmer?
    Anyone familiar with me would have to smile at this question, knowing that my answer would be and continues to be the food police. The on-farm hurdles we’ve faced, from drought to predators to flood to cash flow, are nothing compared to the emotional, economic and energy drain caused by government bureaucrats. Even in the early 1970s when, as a young teen, I operated a farm stand at the curb market, precursor of today’s farmers markets, the government said I couldn’t sell milk. The first business plan I came up with to become a full-time farmer centered around milking 10 cows and selling the milk to neighbors at regular retail supermarket prices. It would have been a nice living. But it’s illegal. In fact, in 2007 I finally wrote Everything I Want to Do is Illegal, documenting my run-ins with government officials.

    I think it’s amazing that in a country which promotes the freedom to own firearms, freedom to worship and freedom of speech, we don’t have the freedom to choose our own food. If I can’t choose the proper fuel to feed my body, I won’t have energy to go shoot, preach and pray anyway. Half the alleged food in the supermarket is really dangerous to your health. In fact, if we removed all the food items in the supermarket that would not have been available before 1900, the shelves would be bare. Gone would be all the unpronounceable gobbledy-syllabic industrial additives, irradiated, GMO, cloned pseudo-food.

    The reason this issue is hard to articulate is because most people don’t realize what’s not on the shelves, or in their diet. We’re fast losing the memory of heritage food, as in made from scratch, in the home kitchen, with culture-wide generic culinary wisdom. I remember when every mom knew how to cut up a chicken. Now, most people don’t know a chicken has bones. As the food police have demonized and criminalized neighbor-to-neighbor food commerce, the food system has become enslaved by the industrial food fraternity. And just around the corner is the National Animal Identification System (NAIS) coming on strong, under the guise of food safety and biosecurity, which will annihilate thousands of non-industrial farms. We don’t need programs; we need freedom. If we really had freedom, farmers like me would run circles around the corporate-welfare, food adulterated, land-abusing industrial farms.

    Thinking About Meat

    What are some of the things you want people to know about the meat they buy from you? What should we all know about the meat we eat?
    The main idea we promote is that our animals enjoy a habitat that allows them to fully express their physiological distinctiveness. I like to say we want our pigs to express their pigness and the chickens their chickenness. The industrial food system views plants and animals as inanimate protoplasmic structure to be manipulated, however cleverly the human mind can conceive to manipulate it.

    I would suggest that a society that views its life from that egocentric, disrespectful, manipulative standpoint will view its citizenry the same way . . . and other cultures. How we respect and honor the least of these creates the ethical, moral framework on which we honor and respect the greatest of these. The freedom for you to express your Tomness or Maryness is directly proportional to the value society places on the pig expressing its pigness. And to think that our tax dollars are being spent right now to isolate the porcine stress gene in order to extract it from pig DNA so that we can further abuse and dishonor pigs, but at least they won’t care. Is that the kind of moral framework on which a civilized society rests? I suggest not.

    This fundamental understanding drives our production models. Herbivores in nature do not eat dead cows, chicken manure, dead chickens, grain or silage: They eat fresh or dried forage. Of course, what’s neat is that empirical data is discovering the nutritional and ecological benefits of this paradigm. We’re reading about Omega 3 and Omega 6 balance, conjugated linoleic acid, polyunsaturated fats and riboflavin. Whenever a new laboratory confirmation of our philosophy hits the news, we make sure our patrons know about it. In a word, this is all about healing: healing our bodies, healing our economies, healing our communities, healing our families, healing the landscape, healing the earthworms. If it’s not healing, it’s not appropriate.

    Perhaps because it’s such a hot topic, let me address the cow-global warming argument. Every bit of the alleged science linking methane and cows to global warming is predicated on annual cropping, feedlots and herbivore abuse. It all crumbles if the production model becomes like our mob-stocking-herbivorous-solar-conversion-lignified-carbon-sequestration fertilization. America has traded 73 million bison requiring no petroleum, machinery or fertilizer for 45 million beef cattle, and we think we’re efficient. Here at Polyface, we practice biomimicry and have returned to those lush, high organic matter production models of the native herbivores.

    If every cow producer in the country would use this model, in less than 10 years we would sequester all the carbon that’s been emitted since the beginning of the industrial age. It’s really that simple. Without question, grass-finished, mob-stocked beef is the most efficacious way to heal the planet. We should drastically drop our chicken and pork consumption and return to our indigenous, climate-appropriate protein source: perennial forages turned into red meat and milk.

    Do vegetarians ever challenge you about raising meat? If so, what do you say in response?
    I will answer this in two parts. The first has to do with the people who think a fly is a chicken is a child is a cat — what I call the cult of animal worship. This would include the people who think we’ve evolved beyond the barbaric practice of killing animals to some cosmic nirvana state where killing is a thing of the past.

    Rather than indicating a new state of evolutionary connectedness, it actually shows a devolutionary state of disconnectedness. A Bambi-ized culture in which the only human-animal connection is a pet soon devolves into jaundiced foolishness. This philosophical and nutritional foray into a supposed brave new world is really a duplicitous experiment into the anti-indigenous. This is why we enjoy having our patrons come out and see the animals slaughtered. Actually, the 7- to 12-year old children have no problem slitting throats while their parents cower inside their Prius listening to “All Things Considered.” Who is really facing life here? The chickens don’t talk or sign petitions. We honor them in life, which is the only way we earn the right to ask them to feed us — like the mutual respect that occurs between the cape buffalo and the lion. To these people, I don’t argue. This is a religion and I pretty much leave it alone.

    The second part of this answer deals with folks who don’t eat meat in order to vote against animal abuse, concentrated animal feeding operations, or pathogenicity. And to be sure, many of these folks have bought into the environmental degradation inherent in livestock farming. To these people, Polyface is a ray of hope. I could write a book about the patrons who have come to us at death’s doorstep because they needed meat, and we’ve watched them heal. To be sure, not everyone needs meat, and those who do have varying levels of need. And when people find out that grass-based livestock offer the most efficacious approach to planetary health, their guilt gives way to compensatory indulgence. After all, they have to make up for lost time, and routinely become our best customers. Their emaciated vegetarian faces fill out, their strength improves and they are happier. Sometimes the easiest thing to do is to just give them a Weston A. Price Foundation brochure. We keep them in our sales building like religious tracts. Oops.

    All About the Farm

    How have you been affected (or not affected) by the recent increase in grain prices?
    This depends on which species we’re talking about. Let’s start with the poultry. Broilers will pick up only 15 percent of their diet off the pasture; layers 20 percent; turkeys 30 percent or more. Since birds are omnivores, they can’t survive on grass alone. Waterfowl jump on up to more than 50 percent. We’ve watched our local genetically modified-free grains double in price over the last 24 months. In response, we’ve raised our chicken and egg prices about 25 percent. Grain is only a portion of the cost, so all we have to do is raise the price enough to compensate for the grain. The amount required to cover these exceptionally high grain prices only amounts to less than $2 per bird. A family buying 50 chickens a year would only pay an additional $100 to cover all the additional feed costs. Of course, the industrial food poultry giants say they can’t pass along these costs to their customers. I don’t know why, but I think it has to do with the idea that people will only pay so much for junk.

    Typically, hogs are similar to chickens, but here at Polyface we’re making an end run by finishing pigs on acorns. Just in the nick of time, we discovered an efficient, cheap way to fence out sections of forest with electric fence. Using quarter-inch nylon rope as poor-boy insulators, we zig-zag a single 12.5 gauge Tipper Tie aluminum wire from tree to tree and erect three- to five-acre finishing glens. In our native Appalachian oak forests, each acre displaces $500 worth of grain. That translates to about $50 per hog in expense, which is enormous. It has allowed us to keep our hog prices fairly stable even with the huge increase in grain prices. We put the pigs in for one month and remove them for 11 to rest and to let the next acorn crop fall. It actually helps the trees, because the pigs root out competing brush and brambles for their starchy roots, in effect weeding the woodlot. All parties win. Very exciting. And if you think about the millions of acres of forests and realize that they could displace tilled, petroleum-based, subsidized, annual grain cropland, you begin to see the potential of this model.

    Finally, salad bar beef. This is the most exciting, because it is completely immune to grain prices. It requires no tillage, no fertilizer, no feed transportation or drying costs. It runs on real time solar energy, self-harvesting with four-wheel drive self-propelled sauerkraut tanks. At Polyface, we believe we’ve become the least-cost producer in an artisanal market, which pushes the gross margin both ways. That’s pretty cool. As a result, we have not raised our beef prices at all, and are watching with great satisfaction the squirming and postulating within the feedlot industry. They don’t need any bailouts. Let them die. To place all of this in historical context, we should all realize that until cheap energy, beef was always the cheapest meat while pork and poultry were the luxuries — especially poultry. When President Roosevelt said his vision for America included “a chicken in every pot,” he was talking about today’s filet mignon. With cheap fuel, cheap grain, cheap labor and cheap pharmaceuticals came cheap poultry. In the continuum of human history, poultry-cheaper-than-beef is a veritable blip. For nutritional, environmental and social reasons, I think it would be fine for the historical beef-poultry relationship to be restored. And most things do eventually find a way of coming home.

    Describe some of the ways you sell your products. You’ve made it a general principle not to ship anything, but there are several ways you sell products locally.
    We have three marketing venues: farmgate, restaurant/retail and metropolitan buying clubs. For the farmgate sales, we send out a newsletter once a year, in the spring, and patrons order for the season from that schedule. We used to sell everything that way, but with frenzied schedules and gas prices, resistance to driving out to the farm started becoming an issue. We live way out in the boonies on a dirt road where the only time you have to lock your car is in August to keep the neighbors from putting runaway zucchini squash in it. This still accounts for 30 percent of our sales. We have public hours, 9 to 4 every Saturday, and that allows us to serve the non-ordering people without sales interruptions throughout the week. Our simple sales building contains scales, freezers and counters to handle these customers.

    Restaurant/retail we lump together because we deliver to them on Thursdays and Fridays every week and they pay about the same prices — a bit of a volume discount. A delivery fee per pound and scaled to volume pays for a vehicle and driver. Several nearby cheese, produce, mushroom and honey growers add their wares to our delivery bus and that helps the distribution economies of scale. We service about 25 upscale restaurants and about 10 retail venues, primarily specialty foodie-type businesses. My daughter-in-law, Sheri, calls these patrons on Tuesday for that week’s orders. Several restaurants in Washington, D.C., use an independent courier to come to the farm and deliver their orders. Among these restaurants is one fast-food establishment: the Charlottesville branch of the national Chipotle chain. This has been a huge undertaking for both of us, but heralds a new awareness of local and ecologically sound food. These venues account for 30 percent of our sales.

    The metropolitan buying clubs grew serendipitously out of quarterly farmgate sales from three Maryland patrons who asked us to deliver to their area for all their friends who would not make the trek to the farm. This has grown to 20 drop points and we deliver to them eight times per year. The same delivery driver and infrastructure that services the restaurants services these patrons. They order via electronic shopping cart (www.polyfaceyum.com). Each drop point must average an annual sales quota and patrons are rewarded with free product for bringing in new customers. This venue provides neighborhood service, low overhead and complete inventory shopping options. We don’t deal with farmers market commissions, rules, product speculation or politics. It’s the ultimate marketing below the radar and keeps us out of the supermarket, with its slotting fees, red tape and tardy invoice payments. This venue now accounts for 40 percent of our annual sales.

    We hope to add an additional venue in the next few months: Sysco via abattoir. In the summer of 2008, we (my wife Teresa and I) along with a partner purchased our local federal-inspected abattoir, T&E Meats, in Harrisonburg, Va. Institutional demand for local, humane and ecological products is growing, but vending contracts preclude purchasing outside large distributor channels. For example, University of Virginia contracts its dining services to Aramark, which contracts its food vending to Sysco. But Sysco requires $3 million liability insurance, hold harmless agreements and other forms before purchasing from anyone. This is a serious impediment to local producers. Having acquired this abattoir, however, we hope to use its high product liability policy as a backdoor entry into the institutional market. Stay tuned.

    You’ve done a lot of work encouraging other people to learn to farm through your books and your apprenticeship program. What are some of the challenges you think that new farmers will have to face?
    The first and greatest challenge is experience — how to do more with less and how to solve problems creatively rather than with something purchased. Land is more available now than it has been in decades. With half of America’s farmland due to change hands in the next 15 years due to the aging farmer, a lot of this land will be available for management at extremely modest cost, owned by family members who aren’t ready to sell, or by new e-boom buyers able to afford to buy. In any case, the weak link will be a track record and experience to take a piece of raw land and make it profitable.

    I think the opportunities are practically unprecedented. We had an apprentice leave two years ago and within three months had offers for 1,000 acres to manage in New York — at virtually no cost except to use it and keep it aesthetically and aromatically romantic. That’s what healing farming is all about, and why it has so much possibility. What landlord wants a Tyson chicken house built on their farm? But all of them love a pastoral setting, especially being able to entertain their city business partners with grass-finished steaks on the porch overlooking your herd of cows. The problem is that our culture tells bright, bushy-tailed young people that farming is for backward, D-student, tobacco-chewing, trip-over-the-transmission-in-the-front-yard, redneck Bubbas.

    When was the last time you heard a group of parents bragging? Ever hear one say, “Well, you can have your doctors, lawyers, accountants and engineers. My kid is going to grow up and be a farmer.” Ever hear that? Not on your life. The biggest obstacle is emotional — overcoming the cultural prejudice against splinters and blisters. That is why I talk about economics and marketing, along with the mystical, artistic elements of the farm. Yes, it’s a lot of work. But what a great office. What a noble life. What a sacred calling.

    Farming... Indeed. What a noble life! What a sacred calling!

    Remember: Personal Organic Gardens can completely change your life. Eating from your own, you'd most probably be healthy and feel happy instead of being ill to some degree, quite probably overweight if not obese, and most likely feeling ill at ease and dissatisfied. Which is all 95+% function of the way you eat. A good reason to start your own Garden, isn't it? We try here to show you how to create and maintain Gardens optimally, both from a functional point of view, as well as for their production.




    Copyright 1964-2008 OSL All rights reserved, worldwide. LICENSE IS HEREBY GRANTED to all to freely link to or to reproduce this page by any means of one's choice, virtual or physical, and to republish it, including in a compilation, etc, as long as the entirety of the page is NOT MODIFIED in any manner (except of course your location if you are publishing a community ad of your own). This includes not modifying the present copyright notice and license, and the permanent link (permalink URL) or “web address” of the page, and license is granted as long as reproduction is not part of a commercial venture, that is, as long as you do not charge for it in any way, be it directly, or indirectly, for example in commercial publications. Commercial licenses available from the copyright holder.

    =================================

    WEB DESIGNERS -GRAPHICS ARTISTS -CODERS -SEO & MARKETING -Etc
    If you wish to volunteer to help us set up specialized websites and particularly complex portal sites using the present material and more, presented in a more graphic way, and complemented with multimedia material, we need you! Software such as like of Drupal or Joomla, more ad-vanced forms of Wordpress, etc, is the way to go, so please contact us, you will be very welcome! We already have the hosting, and quite a few domains, all we need is your elbow grease! ;)=================================

    Tuesday, September 30, 2008

    HORROR STORY - More Lawn-Related Statistics

    HORROR STORIES or LAWN-RELATED STATISTICS

    Just statistics -- nothing more, nothing less! And no one will be able to tell you you are making any of this up! Every single fact or statement is documented -- the numbers at the end of each paragraph refering to the source reference(s), given after each page as pages would print.

    I. Pesticides, Herbicides, and Fertilizer

    Each year in the US, over 70 MILLION TONS of chemical fertilizers and pesticides are used on residential lawns and gardens. [2]

    The average homeowner uses approximately 10 times the amount of chemical pesticides per acre as farmers. [3]

    Lawn-care pesticides kill approximately 7 million birds in the US each year. [4]

    Pesticides kill between 60 and 90% of earthworms (which are important for soil health) where they are used. [1]

    Pesticides can be tracked into homes, where they can build up in carpets, clothing and other material, putting families, especially children, at risk of chronic exposure. [5-6]

    “Pesticides have been linked to solid tumors (including brain cancer, prostate cancer, kidney cancer and pancreatic cancer, among others), non-Hodgkin's lymphoma, leukemia, effects on the nervous system, birth defects, fetal death and intrauterine growth retardation.” [7]

    A study of the United States major streams and rivers revealed that 96% of fish contained detectable levels of at least one pesticide. [8]

    When fertilizers runoff into water systems, the nutrients lead to algae buildup, depleting the dissolved oxygen content, which in turn reduces the amount of fish a system can sustain. [9]

    =================================
    1 National Wildlife Federation. Available online at
    2 Ibid.
    3 Templeton, S.R., Zilberman, D., Yoo, S.J. (1998). “An Economic Perspective on Outdoor Residential Pesticide Use”, Environmental Science and Technology 32, 421A.
    4 Pimentel, D. (2004). Quoted in Steinberg’s (2006) American Green: The Obsessive Quest for the Perfect Lawn.
    5 Wargo, J. (1996). Our Children’s Toxic Legacy: How Science and Law Fail to Protect Us from Pesticides. New Haven, Connecticut: Yale University Press.
    6 Nishioka, M.G. et al. (2001). Distribution of 2,4-D in Air and on Surfaces Inside Residences after Lawn Applications: Comparing Exposure Estimates from Various Media for Young Children”, Environmental Health Perspectives, 109.
    7 Ontario College of Family Physicians. (2004). Pesticides Literature Review. Available online at
    8 Gilliom, R. (U.S. Geological Survey). (1999). (1999). Pesticides in the Nation’s Water Resources. Water Environment Federation Briefing Series Presentation.
    9 Bormann, F.H., Balmori, D., Geballe, G.T. (2001). Redesigning the American Lawn: A Search for Environmental Harmony. (2nd ed.). Connecticut: Yale University Press.
    =================================

    Fertilizers can also contaminate groundwater, increasing the levels of nitrate in drinking water to unhealthy levels. “High levels of nitrate in drinking water can cause nervous system impairments, birth defects, cancer, and "blue baby syndrome," in which the oxygen content in an infant's blood falls to dangerous levels.” [10]

    II. Water

    “A standard 19L/minute lawn sprinkler uses more water in an hour than a combination of 10 toilet flushes, two dishwasher loads, two 5-minute showers and a full load of clothes.” [11]

    The energy used to transport water to lawns can be even higher than the energy used to mow lawns. [12]

    In the US, lawn-watering accounts for approximately 30% of residential water consumption along the east coast and up to 60% of consumption along the west coast. [13]

    III. Land and Conservation

    Approximately 25 to 40 million acres of land have been converted to lawn in the US alone. [14]

    Each year, over 382,850 acres of land are converted to lawns in North America. [15]

    Approximately 80% of US households have a lawn. [16]

    Turf grass covers over 27.5 million acres in the US, of which 21 million is private lawns. [17]

    Lawns generally consist of 1 to 3 species of grass, whereas a single garden can contain over 1000 species of plants. [18]

    =================================
    10 Weyer, P. (2001) Nitrate in Drinking Water and Human Health. Avilable Online at and Bowman, D.C., Cherney, C.T., Rufth, T.W.Jr. (2002). “Fate and Transport of Nitrogen Applied to Six Warm-Season Turfgrasses”, Crop Science, 42:833.
    11 Environment Canada. (2006). Freshwater Website: Quick Facts. Available online at
    12 City of Irvine, Community Development Department. (1991). Sustainable Landscaping Guideline Manual, 1991 Draft.
    13 National Wildlife Federation. “Cut Your Lawn-In Half.” Available online at
    14 Robbins, P., Birkenholtz, T. (2003).“Turfgrass Revolution: Measuring the Expansion of the American Lawn”, Land Use Policy 20:182.
    15 Ibid.
    16 Borman, F.H., Bamori, D., & Geballe, G.T. (2001). Redesigning the American lawn: A search for environmental harmony. (2nd ed.). Connecticut: Yale University Press.
    17 Ibid.
    =================================

    Lawns not only contribute to loss of habitat, but the pesticides used strictly limit the species that can grow on the applied space and surrounding areas where the pesticides spread. [19]

    The conversion of native grasslands to lawns has been a major reason why grassland birds are among the most threatened types of birds in North America. [20]

    IV. Money, Time and Safety

    North Americans spend a combined 40 billion dollars annually on their lawns-more than the entire continent gave in foreign aid in 2005.2021 [21]

    The average homeowner spends approximately $220 annually on their lawn. [22]

    The average homeowner spends more per acre on their lawn than it costs per acre to grow corn, rice, or sugarcane. [23]

    Over 5 billion dollars is spent annually on fossil fuel-derived fertilizers for North American lawns. [24]

    The average homeowner works over 150 hours annually on their lawn. [25]

    Each year, approximately 75,000 Americans are seriously injured in lawn mower accidents and 10,000 of those accidents involve children. [26]

    More than 30% these injuries result in an amputation of some sort, meaning more than 22,000 limbs and digits are lost to lawn care each year solely considering mowing accidents. [27]

    =================================
    18 Smith, R.M., Thompson, K., Hodgson, J.G., Warren, P.H., Gaston, K.J. (2006). “Urban Domestic Gardens (IX): Composition and Richness of the Vascular Plant Flora, and Implications for Native Biodiversity.” Biological Conservation 129, 312-322.
    19 Sauer, J.R., J.E. Hines, I. Thomas, J. Fallon, and G. Gough. (2000). “The North American breeding bird survey, results and analysis 1966 – 1999. Version 98.1, USGS Patuxent Wildlife Research Center, Laurel, MD.” Available online at
    20 Morris, K. (2005), as cited in Steinberg, T’s (2006) American Green: The Obsessive Quest for the Perfect Lawn.
    21 Shah, A. (2006). The US and Foreign Aid Assistance.
    22 National Gardening Association. (2000). National Gardening Survey. National Gardening Association, Burlington (VM).
    23 Ibid.
    24 Bormann, F.H., Balmori, D., Geballe, G.T. (2001). (1993). Redesigning the American Lawn: A search for environmental harmony (First Edition) Connecticut: Yale University Press.
    25 Wood, D. (2006). “Green Green Grass”, En Route, June, 2006.
    26 University of Michigan Health System, “U-M experts warn about the dangers of lawn mowers, especially with kids” (June 2, 2003). Available online at
    27 Costilla, V., Bishal, D.M. (2006) “Lawnmower Injuries in the United States: 1996 to 2004”, Annals of Emergency Medicine, 47(6).
    =================================

    According to the US Bureau of Labor Statistics from 2004, you are more likely to be fatally injured on the job mowing lawns than as a police officer. [28]

    V. Consumption, Emissions and Pollution [See Table 1]

    Each year, over 800 million gallons of gasoline are consumed by lawn mowers in the United States, which can produce the equivalent of 10 billion kWh. [29]

    Lawnmowers are responsible for approximately 5% of the US’s air pollution, and an even higher percent of the air pollution in metropolitan areas. [30]

    “A conventional lawn mower pollutes as much in an hour as 40 late model cars (or as much air pollution as driving a car for 100 miles).” [31]

    Over 17 million gallons of fuel, mostly gasoline, are spilled in North America every summer while lawn equipment is being refueled, which can lead to contamination of groundwater. [32] (This is more than all the oil spilled by the Exxon Valdez, in the Gulf of Alaska.)

    Gas lawn mowers emit 10 to 12 times more hydrocarbons than a typical automobile per hour of operation. Weed-eaters emit 21 times more and leaf blowers emit 34 times more. [33]

    “One hour of lawn mowing will produce approximately 2 kg of carbon dioxide, 1.8 kg of carbon monoxide, 178 g of VOCs, 6 g particulate matter and 1.8 g of nitrogen oxides.” [34]

    =================================
    28 U.S. Department of Labor. Bureau of Labor Statistics. (Sept. 9, 2004). “Fatal Occupational Injuries.” Available online at
    29 US Environmental Protection Agency. “Lawn and Garden(Small Engine) Equipment.” Available online at and People-Powered Machines. “Gas Mower Facts.” Available online at
    30 Ibid.
    31 Ibid.
    32 U.S. EPA. (2003). A Source Book on Natural Landscaping for Public Officials. Available online at
    33 National Wildlife Federation. Available online at
    34 City of Louisville, Kentucky. (2006). Lawn Care for Cleaner Air Program. Available online at
    =================================

    “Leaf blowers (voted as 'one of the worst inventions ever' in 2002) emit roughly 26 times the carbon monoxide and 49 times the particulate matter per hour than a new light-duty vehicle.” [35]

    Seven gallons of gasoline must be used just to manufacture enough fertilizer to cover one average-sized family yard. [36]

    The breakdown of nitrogen fertilizers releases nitrous oxide -a greenhouse gas and contributor to acid rain, the ozone hole, and smog. [37]

    Yard waste accounts for approximately 18% of municipal waste. [38]

    "The World Health Organization and the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) both recommend that people limit their total exposure to noises as loud as a lawn mower to 45 minutes per day for the quieter gas mowers, 15 minutes for the average mowers, and five minutes for the loudest ones." [39]

    VI. "American Green"

    In the US, April is National Lawn Care Month-“It’s the perfect time to honor the environment both through Earth Day and National Lawn Care Month.”-Representative from Professional Lawn Care Association of America.

    Amount of turf - 25 to 40 million acres- size of Kentucky to Florida, twice the acreage of planted cotton in the US.

    Between 1994 and 2004 estimated average of 75,884 Americans/year were injured with lawn mowers, roughly the amount injured by firearms.

    Using a gas-powered leaf blower for a half hour emits as many hydrocarbons as driving a car 7700 miles at 30mph.

    In the process of refueling their lawn equipment, Americans spill about 17 million gallons of gasoline every summer~ 50% more than marred the Alaskan coast during the notorious Exxon Valdez disaster.

    =================================
    35 Glassman, S., Vanitzian, D. (2002). “Fed Up With Noisy Leaf Blowers”, Los Angeles Times, Nov. 17, 2002 and California Environmental Protection Agency. (2000). Report -Exhaust Emissions: Report to the California Legislature, 40, 50.
    36 Perry, L. (2006). Fuel-Efficient Lawns and Landscapes. Available online at
    37 Environment Canada. (2006). Nitrogen Oxides -NOx. Available online at
    38 Perry, L. (2006). Fuel-Efficient Lawns and Landscapes. Available online at
    39 The Noise Pollution Clearing House. (2004). The Quiet Zone, Summer, 2004.
    =================================

    In Tampa, FL, a single golf course uses 178,800 gallons of water per day ~ more than the daily water needs for over 2200 Americans.

    Lawns are founded on two resources the US is running short on-oil and water. Keeping a lawn green takes an average of 1-2 inches/week, easily over 10,000 gallons each summer for a typical 1000ft2 lawn. Natural gas is used to produce fertilizer, petroleum powers our mowers, oil is used in leaf blowers, weed whackers, and edgers, not to mention the gas used in landscape crews pick ups.

    “You plant Arnold Schwarzenegger and five years from now you have Danny DeVito. Turfgrass is not native to North America and this fact combined with the continent’s highly diverse climatic conditions, makes the perfect lawn an elusive goal.”

    2,4-D most extensively used herbicide in the history of the world.

    A man weighing 180 pounds burns nearly 500 calories/hr pushing a nonmotorized reel mower.

    Noise pollution-freeway traffic at a distance of 50ft = 68-76 decibels leaf blowers = 98-106 decibels. Every increase in 10 decibels equals a doubling in loudness, and anything over 85 decibels is considered harmful to hearing.

    Leaf blowers-26 times the amount of CO/hr as new vehicle and 49 times more particulate matter-“among dirtiest engines on the face of the earth”-California Air Resources Board A morning mowing ban was part of Texas SIP for Houston area, but was revised and removed before implementation. In LA, leaf blowers have been banned for over a decade and continue to be illegal although cops generally turn their head.

    The Southwest, once highly recommended to the allergic, Bermuda-grass lawns have been steadily increasing pollen counts. According to Dr. Slavin, a St. Louis allergist, “Now when a patient says that maybe he should move to Tucson, I pull out my physician’s directory and show them the 28 allergists in Tucson—all, presumably making a good living.”

    Change in Tide Could Be on the Horizon

    Severe droughts and diminishing water supplies have caused several localities to put bans on lawn watering, planting, etc. In Las Vegas, new homes are limited to 50% turf in their front yards, and the Southern Nevada Water Authority now offers rebates to homeowners who rip their lawns. In Aurora, Colorado, sprinklers were banned in 2002, along with the planting of any new lawns the following year.

    Several cities across the Midwest have recently restricted the fertilizer and pesticide use on lawns

    VII. TruGreen ChemLawn - The true horror story

    “TruGreen ChemLawn is the largest lawn care provider in the United States serving more than 3.4 million households and annually generating more than $1.3 billion in income. Think of it! Just ONE company is making $1.3 Billion a year "caring" for "lawns"...

    TruGreen ChemLawn contributes to the yearly application of more than 70 million pounds of pesticides on some of America’s 30 million acres of lawns. The amount of pesticides applied is significant; the rate of pesticides used on lawns is on average ten times more per acre than what is used on agricultural land.

    TruGreen ChemLawn’s standard customer receipt lists 32 pesticides available for use through its residential lawn care program. An analysis of these pesticides by Toxics Action Center based on information from the pesticide manufacturer’s Material Safety

    Data Sheets reveal:

    17 of 32 (53%) of TruGreen ChemLawn’s pesticide products include ingredients that are possible carcinogens, as defined by the United States Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA) and the World Health Organization’s International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC).

    All 32 of TruGreen ChemLawn’s pesticide products include ingredients that pose threats to the environment including water supplies, aquatic organisms, and non-targeted insects.

    9 of 32 (28%) of TruGreen ChemLawn’s pesticide products include ingredients that are known or suspected reproductive toxins (7/32 known, 22%).

    11 of 32 (34%) of TruGreen ChemLawn’s pesticide products include ingredients that are known or suspected endocrine disruptors (4/32 known, 12.5%).

    13 of 32 (41%) of TruGreen ChemLawn’s pesticide products include ingredients that are banned or restricted in other countries.

    Despite these dangers, TruGreen ChemLawn continues to grow and recruit new residential and commercial customers.” [40]

    VIII. Suggestions : [41]

    I. To the very least, reduce lawn size : Leave as much land as possible in its natural state. Or, much better, transform all that wasted land into a productive Organic & Sustainable food-producing Garden!

    II. Choose native and drought tolerant species : Native species require little if any watering, fertilizer, and maintenance since they are adapted to the climate and soil. [42]

    Planting native species protects natural biodiversity and ecosystems while also attracting wildlife. [43]

    III. Watering : Water your lawn in the evening or early morning to minimize evaporation. Water slowly and at least one inch at each watering. Collect rainwater for landscaping needs. Water on sloped areas with care

    IV. Mowing : Leave clippings on the lawn to provide nutrients equivalent to one application of fertilizer.

    =================================================
    40 Refuse to Use ChemLawn. (2005). “Be Truly Green.”
    41 Massachusetts Department of Food and Agriculture. “Water Use and Conservation Facts.” Available online
    42 Go for Green. (2006). Fact Sheet #6: Gardening with Native Plants. Available online at
    43 Ibid.
    =================================================

    “Clippings do not cause thatch. Mulching mowers are also available which help the clippings hide in the grass. If you mow the lawn before it gets too tall, the clippings left on the lawn will quickly disappear from view. Of course this technique also saves hauling yard waste to the landfill -some states have banned yard waste from landfills.” [44]

    Use Alternative Mowers : “Push mowers (reel mowers) used to be heavy, clunky contraptions which required great effort in cutting the lawn. A new generation of reel mowers has been designed, however, which operate much more effectively with a fraction of the effort. The added benefits include a good light exercise and pollution-free lawn care.”

    The Bully Push Mower : “This 15" Easy Push Mower has a five-blade reel for a perfect cut, hardened steel blades, ball bearing wheels, and easy spin gearing. At 18 lbs., it's much lighter weight than other reel mowers on the market.” [45] Price? $99.95

    =================================================
    44 Earth Easy. (2007). “Natural Lawn Care.” Available online at
    http://www.eartheasy.com/grow_lawn_care.htm
    45 Ibid.
    =================================================

    But more than anything else, the self-evident conclusion to all this should be quite self-evident: Get rid of that lawn, and replace it by Edible Landscaping and a food-producing Organic and Sustainable Garden!

    ******

    Table 1 - Fuel Consumption from Lawn and Garden Equipment, 2005 Equipment Classification Gasoline Diesel Total fuel consumption (in million gallons)

    Mowing Equipment
    Front mowers Commercial 19.24 90.77 110.01
    Lawn & garden tractors Commercial 214.86 18.74 233.59
    Lawn & garden tractors Residential 523.91 0 523.91
    Lawn mowers Commercial 144.52 0 144.52
    Lawn mowers Residential 194.27 0 194.27
    Rear engine riding mowers Commercial 15.74 0 15.74
    Rear engine riding mowers Residential 38.69 0 38.69
    Total 1,151.22 109.5 1,260.72

    Commercial turf equipment
    Commercial 686.16 14.56 700.73
    Rotary tillers over 6 HP Commercial 80.73 0 80.73
    Rotary tillers under 6 HP Residential 18 0 18
    Total 784.89 14.56 799.46

    Wood Cutting Equipment
    Chain saws over 6 HP Commercial 80.52 0 80.52
    Chain saws under 6 HP Residential 19.5 0 19.5
    Chippers/stump grinders Commercial 37.44 123.52 160.96
    Shredders over 6 HP Commercial 8.55 0 8.55
    Total 146.02 123.52 269.54

    Blowers and Vacuums
    Leafblowers/vacuums Commercial 200.68 0.01 200.69
    Leafblowers/vacuums Residential 19.49 0 19.49
    Snowblowers Commercial 30.08 1.61 31.69
    Snowblowers Residential 15.92 0 15.92
    Total 266.17 1.62 267.79

    Trimming Equipment
    Trimmers/edgers/brush cutter Commercial 64.1 0 64.1
    Trimmers/edgers/brush cutter Residential 28.11 0 28.11
    Other lawn & garden equipmentb Commercial 22.39 0.34 22.73
    Other lawn & garden equipmentb Residential 18.76 0 18.76
    Total 133.36 0.34 133.71
    Total All Equipment 2,481.66 249.56 2,731.22

    Source:
    U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, NONROAD2005 Model, www.epa.gov/otaq/nonrdmdl.htm .
    a Includes equipment such as aerators, dethatchers, sod cutters, hydro-seeders, turf utility vehicles, golf course greens mowers, and sand trap groomers.
    b Includes equipment not otherwise classified such as augers, sickle-bar mowers, and wood splitters. Available online at http://www-cta.ornl.gov/data/tedb26/Spreadsheets/Table2_10.xls

    * Note: There are slight variations in EPA estimants and National Wildlife Federation estimants of annual fuel consumption most likely due to differences in data year collection and classification of lawn care equipment.


    Copyright OSL 2008. All rights reserved. Standard license.
    Permalink for the present post: http://optimalgardens.blogspot.com/2008/09/horror-story-more-lawn-related.html

    CALLING FOR A "HOLY WAR" AGAINST LAWNS

    CALLING FOR A "HOLY WAR" AGAINST LAWNS

    When you really think of it, lawns certainly end among some of the most foolish and ridiculous creations of the human mind...

    The concept of lawns arose from the fact that the dominant power from roughly 1750 to 1950 was Great-Britain. There, it rains all the time, and there, the green grassy areas that gave birth to the idea of "lawn" are more or less natutal occurences. The idle rich landowners of the landed gentry were intent to show off their wealth, and huge green areas put to no particular use were a way to do just that. They were in turn copied by increasingly less wealthy people, as lawns became a sign of status, slowly trickling down the social scales.

    The rest is history. People like and tend to reproduce the familiar. As Englishmen of Imperial Britain tried to recreate a semblance of their native environment and customs wherever they went, the lawn as an universal "must" was unfortunately born. Even in semi-desert or desert climates such as say Australia or the American "South-West" (read, Southern California), where lawns and these super-lawns known as "golf courses" are nothing short of monstrosities...

    In fact, believe it or not, the amount of space, time, energy, water and other resources yearly invested in lawns are absolutely staggering, making them the number one "agricultural" endeavor in the United States.

    SOME LAWNMOVER STATISTICS:

    EPA Statistics: Gas Mowers represent 5% of U.S. Air Pollution
    ---------------------------------------------------------------

    FACT 1: Just one hour of mowing is the equivalent of driving 350 miles in terms of volatile organic compounds.

    Fact 2: One average gas mower spews 87 lbs. of the greenhouse gas CO2, and 54 lbs. of other pollutants into the air. Every year.

    Fact 3: Over 17 million gallons of gas are spilled each year refueling lawn and garden equipment – more oil than was spilled by the infamous Exxon Valdez.

    ----------------------------------------------------------------

    Each weekend, about 54 million Americans mow their lawns, using 800 MILLION gallons of gas per year. And producing millions of tons of air pollutants in the process. Garden equipment engines, which have had unregulated emissions until very recently, emit the highest levels of carbon monoxide, volatile organic compounds and nitrogen oxides, producing up to 5% of the nation's air pollution. And a good deal more in metropolitan areas.

    According to the U.S. EPA (Environmental Protection Agency), one traditional gas powered lawn mower produces as much air pollution as forty-three new cars each being driven 12,000 miles. That's *1* lawnmover and *43* CARS and 12,000 MILES. 1 lawnmover, 43 cars... Think of it!

    Speaking of gas, the EPA states that 17 million gallons of fuel, mostly gasoline, are spilled each year while refueling lawn equipment. That's more than all the oil spilled by the Exxon Valdez, in the Gulf of Alaska. In addition to groundwater contamination, spilled fuel that evaporates into the air and volatile organic compounds spit out by small engines make smog-forming ozone when cooked by heat and sunlight.

    Until 1995, lawnmower emissions were unregulated. Older more powerful, less efficient two-cycle engines release 25-30% of their oil and gas unburned into the air. Gas mowers emit hydrocarbons (a principle ingredient of smog), particulate matter (damaging to your respiratory system, and even worse for children), carbon monoxide (a poisonous gas) and carbon dioxide (contributing to global warming). The health toll includes cancer as well as damage to lungs, heart, and both the immune and detoxification systems. In addition, smog inhibits plant growth. EPA regulations are beginning to reduce mower emissions, but there is still a very long way to go...

    And all this were just lawnmover statistics. [If you want to know more about this, just go here: http://www.peoplepoweredmachines.com/faq-environment.htm ]

    And of course, it does not stop there. Far from it!

    In fact, just here in the USA, there is something like 30 to 40 MILLION acres [12 to 16 Million Hectares, for readers elsewhere] of lawns. Making them the most-planted U.S. "crop" ever.

    Lawns also use, in average, 10 times MORE toxic chemicals than the most intensively chemical-based conventional agriculture.

    Actually, being in the "lawn care" business is one of the most dangerous occupation there is, perhaps more dangerous than being in the military in time of colonial wars. In fact, according to the US government, you have significantly more chances to be injured on the job working as a lawn maintenance worker than working as a police officer.

    To begin with, if dealing with lawns is your job, cancer is not a possibility, but almost a certitude. And the host of lawn-"care"-related chronic and acute diseases almost reads like a list of everything bad you can develop.

    This is to say nothing yet about the fact that, in 2001, lawns COST about $37.7 BILLION a year to maintain. A little of that money was actually used on non-lawn "garden"-related purchases, but with the runaway inflation since 2001, one can evaluate that the cost of "lawns and gardens" for 2008 will probably be in the vicinity of $50 BILLION, with the purely "lawn" part of that money over $45 BILLION.

    That's over the yearly budget of many countries, and one could have a nice medium-priced war for that amount of money. If this same amount was invested four years in a row into the creation of solar power or wind power systems in suitable locations, say Nevada for solar and North Dakota for wind, it would be enough cash to actually create the infrastructure to generate the entire electricity used in the USA in a whole year, renevably and free to the consumer, for as long as the system will be maintained. Just imagine... a world with no lawns, but free electricity to all households! And from the fifth year on, of course, that same money could be used to... well, you name it. That gives you an idea of the actual money hole that lawns represent!

    This, of course, is all a little bit theoretical... So, the very same thing could be said in a different way: Assuming you are a homeowner and have a lawn, if you stopped "caring" for your useless lawn, and invested wisely all the money so saved, for retirement or a college education for your children, you could create quite a sizeable nest egg that way. To say nothing about the enormous amounts of time also so saved, in addition.

    In short, lawns are definitely things of the past. They need to go the way of the horse and buggy, of DDT and Agent Orange, and of the 8 or 10 miles a gallon gas-guzzler. It's time for us all to grow up! Lawns are definitely OUT.

    Eliminating lawns should of course first and foremost be done by educating the public at large, and experience proves that many people are quite receptive when exposed to the facts. But it could also be done by more "persuasive" approaches, that is, by a positive use of the often highly abused coercive power of the State, what we usually call "government".

    Since "the power to tax is the power to kill", lawns as contemptuous wastes of space and resources are prime candidates for taxation, and, in fact, should be taxed. And taxed heavily. By the square foot.

    To the contrary, every amount of land dedicated to organic food production, and particularly, to personal and family gardens, should to the very minimum be taken off tax roles completely. Not be taxed at all, or even better, perhaps subventioned from the proceeds of redistributed lawn taxes.

    Such an approach to the lawn problem would create a powerful incentive toward the disparition of lawn waste, as well as encourage the advent of personal organic food production, with quite predictible yet truly momentous consequences for public health and the common well-being.
    However, you don't have to wait for such measures to start taking action yourself now!

    DO IT YOURSELF & DO IT NOW: First, of course, start with your own lawn. And spread the word. What's most remarkable with community approaches is that any municipality or county can create and implement laws and regulations to this effect. There is no need to wait for State or federal laws that might never come, considering in whose pay the average professional politician is.

    Educating oneself and one's family, friends and neighbors about lawns does not take much effort. It's impossible for anyone who thinks rationally to read the three first posts in the present blog, and not be convinced that there is indeed sort of a "small problem" at hand when it comes to lawns... Taking action about it yourself and sharing the information are both easy steps to take -- as it will only save you and your friends and family lots of time and money, and that, right away.

    Even more formal and "persuasive" community action is also something that can be done locally, completely at the proverbial grass-roots level. All it takes is the will to do it, and get to the very roots of that grass.


    It's something simple and easy to do, and you can decide to start doing it right away! Don't be surprised if suddenly you can envision yourself, a few months from now, looking back to this very moment as you are enjoying the products of your brand new organic and sustainable garden, a garden that flourishes where that useless time & money lawn thief once was, as you start congratulating yourself for having taken the decision to get rid of that lawn and replace it by something useful, beautiful and healthy right away. You will see how glad you are for having taken the right decision right now! It was probably one of the best decisions you ever made! It's like quitting smoking and truly have lost the habit... No one who ever got off lawns ever regretted to have replaced these unhealthy money and time sinks by an Organic and Sustainable Garden!

    And wait until you read the crushing statistics coming in the next post! Once you get to real statistics, lawns really read like a horror story!



    Copyright OSL 2008 - All rights reserved. Standard non-commercial license to reproduce freely. Permalink of the present post: http://optimalgardens.blogspot.com/2008/09/calling-for-holy-war-against-lawns.html

    Wednesday, September 24, 2008

    [OG-BGLG00] BUILDING GREEN & LIVING GREEN -- HOW POSSIBLE? HOW EASY?

    BUILDING GREEN & LIVING GREEN -- HOW POSSIBLE? HOW EASY?
    [OG-BGLG00 V100-080924]


    First, let's define what we mean by building green, and living green. That's easy, basically, we mean by that about what most people would imagine it means: Low footprint and utilization of resources, as healthy as possible, as close to nature as possible AND practical (being aware that the possible is not always practical), as as free of artificial chemicals and GMO as can be done, etc, etc...

    This being said, how easy is it to build green and live green today?

    Unfortunately, not that easy...

    There are two principal sets of obstacles to building green, and living green:

    The first one is knowledge, usually, the lack thereof, but often also, the illusions that pass for knowledge, that have no or very little anchoring in reality, unless we count as "reality" delusions-for-a-purpose, such as the ones sold by advertizing, anchorings that thrive by hypnotizing and ensnaring the human mind with beliefs, ideas, or even convictions that are simply have no factual basis.

    The second set are the *practical* obstacles, from changing our ways of thinking, to learning to do things differently, and finally, actually doing things in a different manner.

    At that level, the principal obstacle to building green and living green is probably government. Taking the form of rules and regulations, taxes, zoning laws, building codes, and the like.

    In facing these types of very real obstacles, it stands to reason that the two classes of people most likely to be able to reach that ideal are the very poor, because they are in a position to simply ignore government, and since there is no juice to press out of a dry lemon, escape the potential consequences; or the very rich, because they have the wherewithals to go around obstacles, comply with byzantine requirements and "get the necessary permits", and, put it in the most general terms, pay their way through or out. Such a situation is nothing new, by the way. It is exactly what existed at the end of the Roman Empire, and it directly led to the success of the Arab conquest of the Southern part on the Empire in the VIIth Century. History repeats itself, and since we seem to always forget it, or never understand its lessons, we are clearly doomed to repeat it.

    At any rate, at a practical level, it's the people in between very rich, and very poor, who have to truly use their wits to build green (which is often very simple, but definitely not "according to code") and live green.

    In the series of articles we plan to publish here under the BGLG heading, we will try to explore all the relevant issues, and look at the ways some people overcomed the obstacles put in our way by contemporary society, and despite all managed to achieve some significant levels of green living, including living in green buildings.

    Copyright 1964-2008 OSL. All rights reserved, worldwide. LICENSE IS HEREBY GRANTED to all to freely link to or to reproduce this page by any means of one's choice, virtual or physical, and to republish it, including in a compilation, etc, as long as the entirety of the page is NOT MODIFIED in any manner (except of course your location if you are republishing a community ad of your own). This includes not modifying the present copyright notice and license, and the permanent link (permalink URL) or “web address” of the page, the present license being granted as long as reproduction or use are not part of a commercial venture, that is, as long as you do not charge for it in any way, be it directly, or indirectly, for example in commercial publications. Commercial licenses are available from the copyright holder.

    ===========================================

    WEB DESIGNERS --GRAPHICS ARTISTS -CODERS -SEO & MARKETING -EtcIf you wish to volunteer to help us set up specialized websites and particularly complex portal sites using the present material and more, presented in a more graphic way, and complemented with multimedia material, we need you! Software such as like of Drupal or Joomla, more advanced forms of Wordpress, etc, is the way to go, so please contact us, you will be very welcome! We already have the hosting, and quite a few domains, all we need is your elbow grease! ;)===========================================

    Sunday, September 21, 2008

    [OG-Ovw01] OVERVIEW OF THE FAMILY OF BLOGS BROUGHT TO YOU BY "HEALTH THRU GARDENING"

    [OG-Ovw01] OVERVIEW OF THE FAMILY OF BLOGS BROUGHT TO YOU BY "HEALTH THRU GARDENING"


    HEALTH THRU GARDENING is the entity who brings you the present blog here at http://optimalgardens.blogspot.com/ . This blog is part of our family of related blogs and is the one focusing on "Optimal Gardens" and "Optimal Gardening" from a general point of view, and also addresses all related issues not covered by one of our more specialized blogs.


    HEALTH THRU GARDENING is a (for the time being) small grassroots non-profit, currently centered on Santa Monica and Malibu, CA. We focus on the relation between Nutrition and Health, and the best ways to insure optimal nutrition, namely, the creation, maintenance and continuous use of food-producing Organic & Sustainable Gardens.

    Hard science demonstrates that the relation between the way we eat and the way we feel as well as the quality and length of our lives is indeed very close. So close that the best experts in the field have come to the conclusion that 95% or more of all chronic or acute diseases and illnesses that afflict us are, in the end, directly or indirectly function of our diet. We definitely are what we eat...

    We are currently developing several blogs related to these subjects, the material of which will later be used to create a specialized portal, and for media syndication.



    Because the quality of what we eat is so important to our health, we believe we should all follow the command once given to health seekers by Pr Dr Otto Warburg, the only physician to ever get TWO Nobel Prizes (missing a third by a hair width): "Get as much food from your own garden as you possibly can!"

    Pr Warburg did not add the word "organic" in that command, because he could not even conceive that anyone would be foolish enough to even think about introducing chemicals in their own garden. For him, the very reason why one would want to and actually needed to have their own garden was precisely to avoid chemical contamination and other adulterations of our own foods! Dr Warburg's specialty was cancer, and he saw man-made chemicals and contaminated or adulterated foods as the direct or ultimate causes of most if not all cancers, and of a host of other medical conditions as well. A fact that has now been completely demonstrated in countless peer-reviewed publications since Pr Warburg's death in 1970.


    Unfortunately, for many of us, our dietary habits are sacred cows, untouchable, sacred even if we have to die for them. And indeed, die we do!

    But if health, longevity and quality of life are of any interest to you, this is something you need to face. Even if you love your fast foods, snacks, dairy, ice cream and "diet" soda. What we are talking about here is not just opinion, feelings, fad or fancy, like about everything you are accustomed to hear about when it comes to nutrition.

    This is not another introduction to some other fad diet.

    This is hard science, science as hard as it will get, and facts so unavoidable that you can only ignore them at your own peril.

    Now, although a personal Organic & Sustainable Garden is not the only possible way to go, it is by far the safest and most cost effective, and this is why we focus on it.


    Now, whether that Organic & Sustainable Garden is in your own backyard or rooftop, at a friend's place, in a Community Garden space, or even is a form of Guerilla Gardening on public or unused land, is not really very important. The only important fact are whether that garden exists, has been created and maintained as optimally as is possible, and if you eat out of it as much as you can. That's it!

    Of course, not everyone will be inclined to maintain their own Organic & Sustainable Garden, so we will explore as well all possible forms of teaming up with friends or neighbors, barter deal, crop sharing deals and "Community Supported Agriculture".

    How you get your unadulterated, fresh and functional food does not matter, as long as you get it!

    Bringing you the best possible information about these and all related subjects is what we will pursue here through the publication of a family of related and interconnected blogs:

  • OPTIMAL GARDENS http://optimalgardens.blogspot.com/
    This is the "General Knowledge" section of our blog family. It's already a treasure trove after only a few months existence, and everything we publish there can be freely reproduced and used by anyone so inclined, anywhere in the world, as long as the material remains unchanged, as our copyright notices are also licenses for non-commercial use.

    Everything published there will be brought to the community in a manner than makes emulating what we do as easy as can possibly be.

  • PERSONAL GARDENS - THE SECRETS OF SUCCESSFUL PERSONAL GARDENING
    http://personalgardens.blogspot.com/ This is the "HOW TO" section of our blog family. And also where the technological aspects will be discussed.

    Technological aspects? Of Gardening??? Indeed! In fact, it is our conviction that in a not too-far-away future, when the quality of the food we eat will be recognized by everyone at all interested in health issues, as the primary factor of Health, we believe that almost every health-conscious person will have an Organic and Sustainable "Personal Garden".

    Exactly like everyone today has a "Personal Computer", and, in fact, several of them (desktop, laptop, iPod, cell phone, etc). And we also believe that these "Personal Gardens" will often be bought ready-made, be automatized and, actually, robotized. A necessary convenience.

    We think of these "Personal Gardens" as the PCs or iPods of Nutrition. And we personally want to be at the forefront of that revolution. In dot-com veteran parlance, we see this as a "killer app'". Perhaps the ultimate killer app'. A paradigm shift of momentous nature, significance, and impact. A meme that has the potential to spread like wildfire. And, obviously, prime IPO material, particularly considering how many patents beg to be applied for around the general concept of "Personal Gardens". Plus, for a host of reasons, it seems fairly clear that the worse things will go for the economy at large, the more Personal Gardens will sell. Considering where we are headed, it should be clear that there is a lot of potential momentum to tap here...

    Once you understand the issues at hand and the potential of the whole concept to completely change the way we eat, and in fact, the way we live, we believe you will be as excited as we are, particularly if you are a bit of the entrepreneurially-minded mindset.
  • And if all you want is to find out how to do-it-yourself optimally and at the least possible cost, you sure found the right pages!

  • HEALTH THRU GARDENING - COMMUNITY SERVICES & ADS
    http://htgcommunityservices.blogspot.com/
    This is the instrument through which we will bring replicable models of what we do to the community, in a way that will allow to emulate them effortlessly. Our goal is to create models that are truly easy to replicate, for anyone so inclined, anywhere in the world.

  • HEALTH THRU GARDENING - THE DATA
    http://healththrugardening.blogspot.com/
    This blog is currently in development, and will focus on the scientific data linking Health with Diet & Nutrition. A major article about "The Warburg Imperative" is in preparation, as well as an in-depth analysis of the "China Project" data brought to us by Oxford and Cornell Universities and the Chinese Academy of Sciences under the leadership of a man who has been hailed as "the Einstein of Nutrition, Pr Dr T. Colin Campbell.

  • Finally, there will be a couple related blogs focusing on specialized issues. The first one is a related blog focusing on Compost & Composting at:
    http://biocomposts.blogspot.com/

  • Interested? Wonderful! You can contact us by email, each blog's URL is also the corresponding email @gmail.com. For example, to discover what the email address for a blog named optimalgardens.blogspot.com/ is, you simply replace ".blogspot" by "@gmail" on the model: optimalgardens[.blogspot].com/ giving you [blogname]@gmail[.com]. This is valid for all our blogs.


    [HC-Site00 - V100-080921] Permalink: http://optimalgardens.blogspot.com/2008/09/og-ovw01-overview-of-family-of-blogs.html

    Copyright 1964-2008 OSL. All rights reserved, worldwide. LICENSE IS HEREBY GRANTED to all to freely link to or to reproduce this page by any means of one's choice, virtual or physical, and to republish it, including in a compilation, etc, as long as the entirety of the page is NOT MODIFIED in any manner (except of course your location if you are republishing a community ad of your own). This includes not modifying the present copyright notice and license, and the permanent link (permalink URL) or “web address” of the page, the present license being granted as long as reproduction or use are not part of a commercial venture, that is, as long as you do not charge for it in any way, be it directly, or indirectly, for example in commercial publications. Commercial licenses are available from the copyright holder.

    ===========================================
    WEB DESIGNERS --GRAPHICS ARTISTS -CODERS -SEO & MARKETING -Etc
    If you wish to volunteer to help us set up specialized websites and particularly complex portal sites using the present material and more, presented in a more graphic way, and complemented with multimedia material, we need you! Software such as like of Drupal or Joomla, more advanced forms of Wordpress, etc, is the way to go, so please contact us, you will be very welcome! We already have the hosting, and quite a few domains, all we need is your elbow grease! ;)
    ===========================================